Islam - Facts and Myths: August 2021

WHAT IS THE SHARIA LAW?

WHAT IS SHARIA LAW IN ISLAM?

https://youtu.be/Fzk7H6y65LE

What will the future hold for Islam and your Quran ?

This discussion between Al Fadi and Jay Smith about what MBS has in mind for the future of Saudi Arabia is very important.

Muslims, What will the future hold for Islam and your Quran ?

https://youtu.be/lKoxNl9qeDY

Book: How (not) to read the Bible

Download it here... (Also as an Audiobook)

https://www.harpercollinschristian.com/blog/2020/09/17/how-not-to-read-the-bible-audiobook-pdf/

NEW BOOK (for Free): GOD & ISLAM - FACTS & MYTHS

This a Book-on-a-Blog

< GOD & ISLAM - FACTS & MYTHS >

We publish it for free now! 

The book covers many questions Muslims have about Religion and has many excellent material to read and download for FREE !

This book can even be TRANSLATED in your own language now.

Click on "Select language" 

WELCOME TO VISIT AND READ IT!

Remember... The Book is For FREE NOW

WELCOME TO LOOK FOR YOURSELF?  

https://god-islam-facts.blogspot.com/

BURNING THE QURAN - THE QURANIC DILEMMA

The fundamental difference between Biblical Christianity and Quranic Islam is called “The Quranic Dilemma”. The Quran declares that it is impossible for the Word of Allah to be changed or distorted. The Quran also declares that the Bible, both Old and New Testaments are the Word of Allah. They then claim that the Bible has been corrupted.

Stop right there.

If the Quran is infallible, then the Bible is the Word of God. If the infallible Quran states that God’s Word cannot be changed, then the Bible has not been changed.

If the Bible has been changed, as Muslims contend, then the Quran is in error either in stating that it is the word of God, or that it cannot be changed. If the Bible has not been corrupted, and the Quran disagrees with the Bible, then the Quran has to be interpreted in the light of the books that came before, and if so, it is found wanting.

They literally cannot have it both ways.

The primary difference between the Quran and the New Testament, specifically, is that

Uthman ibn 'Affan, the third Caliph of Islam after Muhammad, who is credited with overseeing the collection of the verses of the Qur'an, ordered the destruction of any other remaining text containing verses of the Quran after the Quran has been fully collected (circa 650-653). Quran desecration - Wikipedia

The slight variations between New Testament manuscripts are often tauted as reasons to impugn the integrity of the New Testament as the inspired word of God by liberal theologians. Some scholars try to solve that problem by contending there is a “Textus Receptus”, a Greek text by Erasmus that correctly and infallibly collected and analyzed the documents and only included the inspired readings. This, in my view, is a ridiculous assertion. More to the case, the variety of documents do not contradict each other at all, and the copyists of the various manuscripts did not consider themselves “scribes” in the classic sense of trying to preserve a word-for-word duplicate of the documents. It is entirely possible that some of the variations were cause by the author himself, in making copies for others in an age without printing presses or photocopiers. The Bible does not claim to be “dictated” but “inspired”.

The Quran, however, is claimed to be “conveyed by an angel”. It can be held to a higher standard, which is exactly the dilemma faced by Uthman ibn 'Affan. His solution was to gather every possible copy, with a similar amount of deviant readings that affects the New Testament, but that would be very damaging to the claim that it was dictated infallibly. The committee he appointed selected that which the Caliph and his court thought best, and burned the rest.

And burned the rest. And burned the rest.

Uthman's committee selected from all the possible copies from the variant Quranic texts that which the Caliph and his court thought best (among all the deviant readings available) as any difference would be very damaging to the claim that the Quran was dictated infallibly)... and burned the rest.

You can read the whole article here...https://qr.ae/pGWGWi

Islam Extremist Statistics

Books: Dr. Michael Ignatius Muluk’s two books (a series about Muhammad)

Dr. Michael Ignatius Muluk’s two books (a series about Muhammad)

- How Muhammad Stole the Judeo-Christian Tradition

- How Muhammad Inverted theJudeo-Christian Tradition

Born Fatih Hamza al-Muluk - the author of this two challenging books - is an Ex-Muslim turned Evangelical Christian, who has studied and lived Islam for most of his life. Being a combat veteran and a security consultant, he had the chance to intimately know both moderate Muslims and Caliphate supporters in Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and South-East Asia.

Muluk, Dr. Michael Ignatius. How Muhammad Stole the Judeo-Christian Tradition (Mike Muluk's Muhammad Series Book 1) (p. 243). Taufkirchen Press. Kindle Edition.

- How Muhammad Stole the Judeo-Christian Tradition

- How Muhammad Inverted theJudeo-Christian Tradition

His answers on Islam, leaving Islam, and terrorism on the popular Q&A platform Quora have been read more than one million times.

The foreword of his first book How Muhammad Stole the Judeo-Christian Tradition gave this warning…

“Be aware that this book is not a scholarly research paper written from the safety of a university’s library by secular scholars who have never even met a radical Muslim in their lives.”

This is a book written by a man who has seen and lived the good, the bad, and the ugly of his faith. A man who decided that it was worth to leave Islam, even risking his own life and that of his family in the process.

After Muluk pointed out that Islam will become the religion with the most followers by the year 2060 he asked this questions: What does that mean for our children? How will Islam affect their lives?

Dr Muluk put a very strong acclamation on the table with his first book.

How Muhammad Stole the Judeo-Christian Tradition.

He explains his reasons as follows:

Everybody agrees that these three world religions Judaism, Christianity, and Islam share a common root – all three are Abrahamic religions. Even Jews, Christians, and Muslims themselves seem to confirm that their faiths share the same traditions, protagonists, and most importantly, a common monotheistic core. Even King Abdullah of Jordan said in an interview with CNN that he believed in Jesus Christ as the Messiah and His Holy Virgin Mother.

If we believe in people like King Abdullah, Islam shouldn’t be very much different to the Judeo-Christian Tradition.

But – the questions Muluk asked - why do we have to deal with the reality that Islam has been at war with the Jews and the Christians for the last 1400 years? Why do most Muslim countries persecute their Christian minorities? Why do we see a global resurgence of the spirit of Jihad? Why do even Muslims in moderate Muslim majority countries such as Indonesia call for the reestablishment of the Islamic Caliphate and the death of Jews and Christians? Are we missing something?

Muluk shared this crazy thought: What if Islam is not an Abrahamic religion at all? What if Islam has nothing to do with its Judeo-Christian predecessors, and all its ties to Abraham and the God of the Bible are just lies made up by Muhammad?

The Book of Dr Muluk reads very easy, and he explained his material from many child experiences like this one: about “The Ramadhan Jackpot”

- When I was a little boy, my parents told me of a very special night in the Muslim calendar: the Laylat al-Qadr, which can be translated as ‘The Night of Decree.’ It commemorates the night the first revelation came to Muhammad in the Cave of Hira. The Laylat al-Qadr is one of the nights of the last ten days of the holy month of Ramadhan.

- If you pray during that night, you will get the equivalent of good deeds as if you have prayed for ten thousand nights. Imagine that: ten thousand nights of prayer! That would be 27 years of praying every night if you do it the regular way. So I was, of course, determined to go with the shortcut method. The problem is that nobody knows which of these ten last days of Ramadhan was really Laylat al-Qadr!

- So, it’s a bit of a lottery for Muslims. As a child, I developed this nifty plan how to win this lottery: simply pray every night for every one of these ten days, and you’ll eventually hit the jackpot (just don’t tell Allah I told you!).

I just finished reading the first book - Absolute a must for every Non-Muslim and for every Muslim

I can't wait to start reading the second book:

- How Muhammad Inverted theJudeo-Christian Tradition

Why I Am Not A Moslem

Why I Am Not A Moslem by Dr. Peter S. Ruckman said...

No Moslem has assurance of salvation of eternal life when he dies. He is promised a chance to fornicate with several dozen virgins if he makes it to Paradise—by works. But not even Mohammed claimed to know where he would “wind up” for certain (Hadith, Bukhari, Vol. V, no. 266). That isn’t all.

Further there are no songs about the founder. There is something ghastly wrong with a religion, where the founder claims to have gotten all his revelations from the Almighty God and talks about “no compulsion in religion,” that produces over one billion followers who can’t sing any songs about him. My, what a mammoth miracle: none of its believers can sing ten songs about the dead sinner who produced it.

Christians have always had a hymn book of some sort. Ever since the day of the Gregorian chants, they have been singing their songs with joy and assurance about salvation, while praising the One that gave it to them: the One who gave it to them was the Founder of their religion. The founder of “Islam’s” religion could give his followers absolutely nothing. He himself didn’t know before he died whether he was going to wind up in Heaven or Hell (Holy Hadith, Bukhari, Vol. V, no. 266).

I think you might like this book – "Why I Am Not A Moslem" by Dr. Peter S. Ruckman.

Start reading it for free: https://a.co/1mjiz2H

APOSTASY IN ISLAM

APOSTASY

QUESTION: WHY ARE ISLAM SO AFRAID FOR A LEVEL PLAYGROUND IN THEIR RELIGION? 

Are Muslims Proud to be part of a Religion?

A Religion that has to force their members to stay faithfull and that can only exist through Punishment and Fear.

I read in an article about Somalia... "Islam is the official religion of the self-declared Republic of Somaliland.

Its constitution prohibits Muslims from converting to another religion, bars the propagation of any religion other than Islam, and stipulates all laws must comply with the general principles of sharia." 

(Note: This is the situation in most Muslim dominated countries). 

NO FREEDOM TO THINK AND DECIDE FOR THEMSELVES!?

WHAT IS APOSTASY IN ISLAM?

(Reference: https://www.answering-islam.org/Index/index.html

Ar: irtidad or riddah. An apostate is called murtad. There has been much controversy among Muslims whether the male apostate is to be put to death. Many Muslim countries prescribed the death penalty for the apostate if he continues in it. A certain grace period may be given for the apostate to for him to repent, after which he may be executed. Death bed repentance is not allowed. The female apostate is to be kept in confinement until she recant or death. If one of a husband or wife apostatize, a divorce takes place and the wife is entitled to her dowry, but if both apostatize together, then the marriage is not dissolved, but Iman Zufar regards that the marriage is annulled. However, if later, one of them returns to Islam, then divorce is necessary (Hamilton, Hidayah, vol. ii. p. 183).

Narrated 'Abdullah:
Allah's Apostle said, "The blood of a Muslim who confesses that none has the right to be worshipped but Allah and that I am His Apostle, cannot be shed except in three cases: In Qisas for murder, a married person who commits illegal sexual intercourse and the one who reverts from Islam (apostate) and leaves the Muslims." (Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 9, Book 83, Number 17)
Narrated Abu Burda:
... The Prophet then sent Mu'adh bin Jabal after him and when Mu'adh reached him, he spread out a cushion for him and requested him to get down (and sit on the cushion). Behold: There was a fettered man beside Abu Muisa. Mu'adh asked, "Who is this (man)?" Abu Muisa said, "He was a Jew and became a Muslim and then reverted back to Judaism." Then Abu Muisa requested Mu'adh to sit down but Mu'adh said, "I will not sit down till he has been killed. This is the judgment of Allah and His Apostle (for such cases) and repeated it thrice. Then Abu Musa ordered that the man be killed, and he was killed. Abu Musa added, "Then we discussed the night prayers and one of us said, 'I pray and sleep, and I hope that Allah will reward me for my sleep as well as for my prayers.'" (Sahih Bukhari 9.58, also Sahih Bukhari 9.271)

According to Abu Hanifah, a male apostate is disabled from selling or otherwise disposing of his property. But Abu Yusuf and Imam Muhammad differ from their master upon this point, and consider a male apostate to be as competent to excercise every right as if he were still in the faith. (Hughes' Dictionary of Islam, p. 16, citing Hamilton, Hidaya, vol. ii, p. 235)
If a boy under age apostatize, he is not to be put to death, but to be imprisoned until he come to full age, when, if he continue in the state of unbelief, he must be put to death. Neither lunatics nor drunkards are held to be responsible for their apostasy from Islam (Hidayah, vol. ii, 246). If a person upon compulsion become an apostate, his wife is not divorced, nor are his lands forfeited. If a person become a musalman upon compulsion, and afterwards apostatize, he is not to be put to death. (Hidayah, vol. iii, 467).
The will of a male apostate is not valid, but that of a female apostate is valid. (Hidayah, vol. iv, 537).

Ali burnt them, but Muhammad said to kill him (with the sword).

Narrated Ikrima:
Ali burnt some people [hypocrites] and this news reached Ibn 'Abbas, who said, "Had I been in his place I would not have burnt them, as the Prophet said, 'Don't punish (anybody) with Allah's Punishment.' No doubt, I would have killed them, for the Prophet said, 'If somebody (a Muslim) discards his religion, kill him.' " (Sahih Bukhari 4.260)

give charity even to the "erring ones", an-Nur 24:22

God alone will punish rejectors, Âl 'Imran 3:15; al-Muzammil 73:11; al-Mudathir 74:11

God did not open a way unless they fight Muslims, an-Nisa' 4:90

no compulsion in religion, al-Baqarah 2:256; Yunus 10:99
This verses, however, do not apply to the Muslim. A Muslim is not allowed to revert.
punishment for those who war against Allah and His messenger is death or crucifixion, al-Ma'idah 5:33

This verse indicates why the Muslim finds it hard to believe that Jesus died on the cross, for it indicates not only an unholy death, but also punishment for the person who died on the cross. However, this is exactly what the Christians believed: that Jesus died on the cross for the sins of mankind.

punishment in the hereafter, al-Baqarah 2:217; at-Taubah 9:74

rejection by others, Âl 'Imran 3:87

repentance, Âl 'Imran 3:89; al-Ma'idah 5:34; at-Taubah 9:5,11; an-Nahl 16:110; al-Ahzab 33:24

on Judgement Day is too late, 40:85

under duress, an-Nahl 16:106

Islamic belief is that apostasy under duress (for eg. torture) is not a sin, and he can even lie about his belief under such circumstances. Contrast this with the Bible's attitude :

[Jesus said:] "Whoever acknowledges me before men, I will also acknowledge him before my Father in heaven. (Matthew 10:32)

NOTE: most verses deal with "Hypocrites" in the original context, ie. people who made a profession of Islam but were not sincere, and then went back to their former beliefs.

"When the desertion of the Hypocrites at Uhud nearly caused a diasaster to the Muslim cause, there was great feeling among the Muslims of Medina against them. One party wanted to put them to the sword; another to leave them alone. The actual policy pursued avoided both extremes, and was determined by these verses. It was clear that they were a danger to the Muslim community if they were admitted into its counsels, and in any case they were a source of demoralisation. But while every caution was used, no extreme measures were taken against them. On the contrary, they were given a chance of making good. If they made sacrifice for the cause ("flee from what is forbidden"), their conduct purged their previous cowardice, and their sincerity entitled them to be taken back. But if they deserted the Muslim community again, they were treated as enemies, with the additional penalty of desertion which is enforced by all nations actually at war." (Yusuf Ali's commentary on an-Nisa' 4:89)

"Whoever turns back from his belief (irtada), openly or secretly, take him and kill him wheresoever ye find them, like any other infidel. Separate yourself from him altogether. Do not accept intercession in his regard." (Al-Baidhawi, commentary on an-Nisa' 4:89, quoted by Samuel Zwemer, The Law of Apostasy in Islam, p.33f)

"The persons spoken of in this passage are the apostates, or those who 'turn from their religion'. A wrong impression exists among non-Muslims, and among some Muslims as well, that the Holy Qur'an requires those who apostatize from Islam to be put to death, but this is not true....As the plain words of the Qur'an show, what is stated here is that the opponents of Islam exerted themselves to their utmost to turn back the Muslims from their faith by cruel persecutions, and therefore if a Muslim actually went back to unbelief he would be a loser in this life as well as in the next, because the desertion of Islam would not only deprive him of the spiritual disadvantages which he could obtain by remaining a Muslim, but also of the physical advantages which must accrue to the Muslims through the triumph of Islam. And neither here not anywhere else in the Holy Qur'an is there even a hint at the infliction of capital or any other punishment on the apostate." (Maulvi Muhammad Ali, The Holy Qur'an, Arabic text with English translation and Commentary, Ahmadiyya Anjuman-i-Ishaat-i-Islam, Lahore 1920, pp.98-99. Ahmadiyya is declared a non-Muslim community by the government of Pakistan)

* Many Muslims believe that the Qur'an does not prescribe the death penalty for apostasy, except when they fight against the believers (an-Nisa' 4:90). Any former Muslim who engages in proselytizing to Muslims will be considered to be fighting against believers. Others believe that the penalty is that the apostate is no under Muslim protection or obligated to avenge his death. The hadiths of Bukhari and Muslim, however, states that "if they change religion (islam), kill them."

"Forbidden is the blood of a Muslim person except under one of three (conditions) - a married person who commits adultery, a person in return for another, and one who has left his religion, separating from the community" (Bukhari and Muslim) (this is one of the forty chosen by al-Nawawi in his well-known collection. In Muslim it is "one who has left Islam")

"Forbidden is the blood of a Muslim person except under one of three - a man who has rejected belief after accepting islam, or commits fornication after marriage (lit. after chastity or fortified protection), or kills someone without (just basis due to) another." (Al-Tirmidhi, Al-Nissa'i, ibn Majah reporting from Uthman. Others include ibn Abbas and abu Huraira and Anas ibn Malik).

* Some scholars have stipulated that the mere abandoning of the 5 prayers is enough to constitute abandoning Islam. (The Hadiths above from A Collection of Knowledge and Wisdoms in Explanation of 60 Hadith of the Collections of the Word, by Zein al-Deen Aby Faraj Abdul-Rahman bin Shihaab ul-Din ibn Ahmad bin Rajab al-Hanbali al-Baghdadi, 795AH)

Âl 'Imran 3:72,86-88,90-91,167; an-Nisa' 4:89,137; al-Ma'idah 5:54; at-Taubah 9:74,107; an-Nahl 16:106-107; al-Ahzab 33:14

Recommended further reading:

The Punishment for Apostasy from Islam
Why Islam today shuts down freedom of religion: Apostasy in the Quran, Traditions, and Islamic Law
Apostasy and freedom of conscience
The Punishment of the Apostate According to Islamic Law by Abul Ala Mawdudi
The Penalties for Apostasy in Islam by 'Abdurrahmani'l-Djaziri
The Law of Apostasy in Islam by Samuel Zwemer
Two Statements on the Punishment of the Apostate According to Islamic Law
Critique of MH Kamali article 'Freedom of Expression in Islam' is Muslim Shaykh G.F. Haddad's response to a moderate Muslim attempt to deny that the penalty for apostasy is death.
Behind The Veil, Chapter 1: The Apostate, Relinquishing the Faith
Links to various web and newsgroup articles

Know the History of the Armenian Genocide

Armenian Genocide (https://www.britannica.com/summary/Armenian-Genocide)

Campaign of murder and expulsion conducted against the Armenian subjects of the Ottoman Empire by the Young Turk government in 1915–16 during World War I (1914–18).

The events continue to be intensely debated. Armenians hold that the campaign was a deliberate attempt to destroy the Armenian people and, thus, an act of genocide.

The Turkish government has refused to recognize it as such, contending that, although atrocities took place, there was no concerted effort to exterminate the Armenian people.

It began in 1915 when the Ottoman authorities, seeking to prevent Armenians within the Ottoman Empire from collaborating with Russia in World War I, ordered the deportation of Armenians, about 1,750,000 in total, from the empire’s eastern provinces to Syria.

In the course of that forced exodus, hundreds of thousands of Armenians were killed in massacres or died of starvation and disease.

Conservative estimates of the total death toll generally range from 600,000 to 1,000,000.

Traditionally they are either Orthodox or Roman Catholic Christians;

Armenia was considered the first Christian state, adopted Christianity as its national religion c. 300 CE.

Quran according to Ali Dashti

HOLY MUHAMMAD?

TODAY'S FALSE MUSLIM CLAIM: MUHAMMAD IS THE WAY THE TRUTH AND THE LIFE

(FORWARDED https://www.facebook.com/100063590342443/posts/228109879318689/ )

On a thread the Muslim Ibrahim Dantata said:

"All the prophets were the way, the only truth, the only life during their ministries and tenures.

So Jesus was the only way, during his tenure with the 12 tribes of Jews. Now its the tenure of holy prophet Muhammad who is the only way, the only truth, the only life till the last man on earth. Q.21:107"

This Post is going to focus on and refute the last sentence of his comment above, since this contains the most egregious errors. Others will be able to observe more mistakes in his statement, such as "12 tribes of Jews"?!

Once again we see Muslims misapplying Jesus words which apply only to Himself and misappropriating them to Muhammad. They did it before when claiming the divine title of Jesus as "The Alpha and Omega" for Muhammad. I responded to that in this post:

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=158682156261462&id=100063590342443

Here is the rebuttal I gave to his comment. Let us see how he and other Muslims respond to it.

□ "Holy"? Muhammad was evil. He broke every one of the Ten Commandments and then some. He was a "narcissist, a pedophile, a racist, a mass murderer, a terrorist, a misogynist, a lecher, a cult leader, an occultist, a rapist, a torturer, an assassin and a looter" to mention a few. The former Muslim Ali Sina offered a reward of $50,000 to anyone who could prove otherwise based on Islamic texts. The reward has never been claimed.

□ "Prophet"? How can anyone who does not come from the prophetic line claim to be a prophet? The Quran admits that prophethood was through Isaac Jacob and his descendants not through Ishmael (Surah 29:27).

How can anyone who does not prophesy nor perform signs claim to be a prophet? The Quran admits Muhammad was not a prophet but just a "warner" (whatever that means) (Surah 29:50). A month before he died he falsely predicted under oath that the last hour would come within a 100 years. (Sahih Muslim 31:6162-6165)

Moreover he died a false prophet's death by poison.

□ "The only way"? Ignoring the fact that Jesus had already said He was The Way The Truth and The Life and no one comes to the Father but by Him, ("no one" means globally not just amongst His people), Muhammad admitted he didn't know the way. He could not even tell what would happen to himself. The Quran gave Muhammad (and gives Muslims) no assurance:

“Say: I am no new thing among the messengers (of Allah), nor know I what will be done with me or with you. I do but follow that which is inspired in me, and I am but a plain warner.” (Surah 46:9)

The Hadith was no more help:

“By Allah, though I am the Apostle of Allah, yet I do not know what Allah will do to me.” (Sahih Bukhari Vol.5 Book 58 Number 266)

Father-in-law of Muhammad, Abu Bakr was no more secure about his destiny. He knew his god too well and was aware that any promises were pretty much meaningless since Allah cannot be trusted given that he boasts of being the greatest deceiver of them all:

"But they (the Jews) schemed/connived/used deceit (Wa-makaroo), and Allah schemed/connived/used deceit, for Allah is the best of deceivers" (wa-makara Allahu wa-Allahu khayru al-makireena)! (Surah 3:54 cf. 8:30)

As such, Allah could say one thing but do another since Allah has no problem changing his mind or breaking his word:

"Whatever a Verse (revelation) do We abrogate or cause to be forgotten, We bring a better one or similar to it. Know you not that Allah is able to do all things?" (Surah 2:106 Hilali-Khan)

Allah basically does whatever he wants to whomever he wants when he wants to since he doesn’t answer to anyone:

"He cannot be questioned as to what He does, while they will be questioned." (Surah 21:23)

This is why Abu Bakr wept over not knowing whether he was truly saved or not:

“Although he had such a faith, which was too great to suffice all the inhabitants of the earth, he was afraid that his heart might go astray. So, he used to utter, while weeping: ‘Would that I have been a bitten tree!’ Whenever he was reminded of his position in Allah’s sight, he would say: ‘By Allah! I would not rest assured and feel safe from the deception of Allah (la amanu limakr Allah), even if I had one foot in paradise.’” (Khalid Muhammad Khalid, Successors of the Messenger, translated by Muhammad Mahdi al-Sharif [Dar al-Kotob al-Ilmiyah, Beirut Lebanon, 2005], Book One: Abu Bakr Has Come, p. 99)

What a sad state of affairs! Abu Bakr was so fearful of Allah’s schemes that he still felt that he couldn’t be safe from Allah’s deceit even if he already had one foot in paradise!

□ "The only truth"? How can a self confessed liar have any claim to the truth? How can a religion which approves of lying claim custody of the truth? Let's just remind ourselves what Islam thinks about the truth, with a review of how it glorifies deceit.

Here are SIX DIFFERENT MEANS of deception that are permissible in Islam: 1) taqiyya, 2) kitman, 3) tawriya, 4) taysir, 5) darura, 6) muruna

•👉Taqiyya (Shia) or Muda’rat (Sunni): tactical deceit for the purposes of spreading Islam.

•👉Kitman: deceit by omission.

eg, when Muslims misquote Surah 5:32

•👉Tawriya: deceit by ambiguity.

•👉Taysir: deceit through facilitation (not having to observe all the tenets of Sharia).

•👉Darura: deceit through necessity (to engage in something “Haram” or forbidden).

•👉Muruna: the temporary suspension of Sharia to make Muslim migrants appear “moderate” to the gullible kuffar who doesn't know what Islam teaches.

To the above six ways of deceit should be added a seventh ... breaking of oaths. And it should be given a name like the other six. Because make no mistake Allah plays fast and loose with oath making. Aside from breaking them can be expiated by a mere 3 days fasting, (Surah 5:89) he gives carte blanche to oath breaking here:

"Allah has already ordained for you, (O men), the dissolution of your oaths (in some cases*): and Allah is your Protector, and He is Full of Knowledge and Wisdom." (Surah 66:2)

*Note: the parenthetical words "in some cases" are not found in the Arabic text.

□ "The only life"? Islam is not about life. It is more about death. Death is glorified, it is mandated. To kill and be killed in Allah's cause is the highest honour any Muslim can achieve.

Cheap is the value your demon god puts on the value of human life, that hijacks God's prerogative since He alone is the giver and taker of life.

Cheap is life to Allah that desires slaughter to manifest the religion. That sums up your death cult.

Surah 8:67: “It is not for any Prophet to have captives until he hath made slaughter in the land.” (Pickthall)

Ibn Ishaq, who was one of the earliest biographers of Muhammad, clarified the meaning behind the chilling words of Allah in the above Quran verse.

Ibn Ishaq: 327: "Allah said, “A prophet must slaughter before collecting captives. A slaughtered enemy is driven from the land. Muhammad, you craved the desires of this world, its goods and the ransom captives would bring. But Allah desires killing them to manifest the religion.”

“Allah desires killing to manifest the religion.” Do we need to say more? Muslim terrorists are passionately satisfying the sadistic desires of Allah. Even though mankind has long transcended the primitive age of barbarism, we still find acts of barbarism in Islam. Muslim terrorists execute hundreds of their captives by beheading them without mercy. It seems to be their favorite form of execution.

Are their acts of beheading a misrepresentation of Islam? Is it un-Islamic? On the contrary, the cruel practice of beheading is sanctioned by Allah in the Quran. And the ritual beheading of the enemies has a long precedent in the history and theology of Islam.

Under Sharia law life is cheap not sacred. Ritual mutilation and death are meted out routinely for various offences. So in short Islam is the destroyer of life not the preserver of it.

□ "Till the last man on earth"? Really? Since when did Muhammad speak for the world?

"You are only a Warner and for every nation there is a guide." (Surah 13:7)

The principle given by the Quran here proves that as per his own standards Muhammad can only be a guide for his nation i.e. Arabia

"And we have sent no messenger but with the language of his people, that he might make (the message) clear for them." (Surah 14:4)

This principle also proves that as per his own standards Muhammad can only be a guide for Arabic speaking people.

"He is (Allah) who has raised among the unlettered people a messenger from among themselves" (Surah 62:2)

So Muhammad claims only to be a prophet for "Umeen" the unlettered people of Arabia.

"And this (Quran) is a blessed book which we have revealed, confirming that which was (revealed) before it, so that you (O prophet) may warn the mother of the cities and those around her." (Surah 6:92)

"And thus we have revealed to you an Arabic Quran, so that you may warn the mother of the cities and those around her." (Surah 42:7)

The above verses clearly show that Mohammed claims to have received a revelation in Arabic to warn people in the cities of his region and of course the Arabic speaking people.

No worldwide prophetic role. Period.

Finally as for Surah 21:107 giving Muhammad a worldwide remit, it should be noted that the purpose of this Surah was as a riposte and rebuke to the people of Mecca for disbelieving in him. As Maududi observes:

"This fact has been stated here 'to tell the disbelievers of Makkah that they were quite wrong in their estimate of the Holy Prophet that he was an affliction and distress for them because they said, "This man has sown seeds of discard among our clans and separated near relatives from each other." They have been told here, "O foolish people, you are wrong to presume that he is an affliction for you; but he is in reality a blessing and mercy of Allah for you."

So the context does not justify anything more than the local area and its people for whom it was intended and in who's language it is written.

WHERE WAS MECCA THEN?

One of the greatest history scholars of the twenth century was Oxfords Dr Patrica Crone. In her study of all ancient documents regarding Mecca she found zero trading documents mentioning Mecca.

She found zero mentions of Mecca from documents from other kingdoms and cities around Mecca. There was zero mention of Mecca in documents from great empires.

Infact the first time she found any mention of Mecca was 741 ad 110 years after Mohammads death And when she searched all the ancient maps Mecca did not appear on any of them under any name till 900 ad.

How is this possible if Mecca was a great trading city. The mother of all cities. How is it if this is true that NO ONE ever heard of it.

She was not alone in her findings no other scholar found any documents either to this day. Scholars today believe Mecca did not exist till after the the 2nd islamic civil war.

ARE ALLAH AND GOD YAHWEH THE SAME?

ALLAH AND GOD YAHWEH ARE NOT THE SAME!

(A post forwarded from Facebook)

Allah of the Qur'an is not the God of the Bible. There is no proof of Allah in any of the previous scriptures other than the Quran. Muzlims, if you know the Tanakh, you are welcomed to prove that your Allah is the ONE and ONLY true God by providing the respective references of the scriptures here.

When Muzlim scholars themselves are confused to understand who Allah is, how an ordinary Muzlim can understand the Arabic Qur'an? Since Muzlims don't read the Bible they have no idea whatsoever about the differences between God Yahweh and Allah.

Here are just a few differences between them.

God Yahweh of the Bible is the FATHER. Both Jews and Christians call him ABBA means the Father.

Allah is Father to NO ONE Surah 112:3.

God Yahweh is ELOHIM means The Living God. The word Elohim can be found more than 2500 times in the Bible.

Allah is not Elohim. There no word Elohim in the whole Qur'an.

God Yahweh is the creator. When Muhammad was born the earth was there already as the creation of God Yahweh. There can't be two creators.

God Yahweh is the SPIRIT.

Allah is not the spirit.

God Yahweh APPEARED to many people including his prophets.

Allah appeared to NONE.

God Yahweh REVEALED his name to Moses at Mt Sinai as "I AM WHO I AM"

Allah never met or spoke to anyone.

God Yahweh had COMPLETED his creation in the beginning itself Genesis 2:1. Allah is creating still (everyday).

God Yahweh REVEALED his name to Moses at Mt Sinai. Allah never revealed his name to anyone. Not even Muhammad.

God Yahweh is mentioned as the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob throughout the Bible.

Nowhere in the Qur'an Allah is called God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.

Abraham sacrificed his PROMISED SON Isaac at Mt Moriah.

Abraham never sacrificed his FIRST BORN SON Ismael to Allah.

God Yahweh liberated the Israelites from the slavery of Egypt and gave them the promised land Israel.

Allah just hates the Jews Surah 5:51, 9:29 etc

God Yahweh sent many prophets to the Israelites warning them time to time. The Bible has many such prophetic BOOKS.

Allah has only one Prophet Mohd. All the 25 names (except Mohd) mentioned as Prophets in the Qur'an were copied from the Bible.

God Yahweh's name is so sacred that no Jew or a Christian utter his name in vain.

Allah can be called any number of times in a day.

God Yahweh hates Sins.

Allah loves them. He wants the Muzlims to commit sins first and then ask his forgiveness.

God Yahweh gave 10 commandments through Moses to be strictly followed by his people.

Allah never gave any such commandments to anyone.

There are hundreds of differences. Just one difference is enough to prove that Allah is different from God Yahweh. There can never be 2 Gods.

Muzlim scholars are confused about your Allah.

https://www.facebook.com/100008929214663/videos/2539001309740818/?sfnsn=wiwspwa

https://youtu.be/PheMaSXhljc

Jay Smith on… “Allah & Muhammad"

Jay Smith on… “Allah & Muhammad had nothing to do with the Quran or Islam - Islam is founded on Lies & Deception”

This presentation was already viewed by 1,416,923 people.

A Summary of the Presentation By Jay Smith - PfanderFilms - https://www.youtube.com/user/PfanderFilms/videos

- The accounts of Jesus were written 15-60 years after the death and Resurrection of Jesus by eyewitness and friends of the eyewitnesses. Matthew and John were eyewitnesses. Mark and Luke got their information from the eyewitnesses.

When you look at what we have historically and what Islam has historically, there is no comparison.

- Islam was written 200-300 years after the death of Muhammad by no eyewitnesses or by people who never knew him, nor even lived in the same country he lived. That is why we can know exactly who Jesus was and what Jesus said.

I Place ALL my Trust in My Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ as Muslims Should.

- Jesus is far more than God’s mere messenger. Jesus Christ is God’s one and only Son (John 3:16-18). Further, He is the Second Person of the Trinity, God incarnate—God Himself (John 1:1,14; 5:18). Jesus claimed to be both “the Lord” and “God”’

- No one can deny that Muslims reject the biblical Jesus. Yet it was Jesus Himself who warned all men, “If you do not believe that I am the one I claim to be, you will indeed die in your sins” (John 8:24).

Jay Smith points out many interesting points that Muslims never told us.

- Allah & Muhammad had nothing to do with the Quran or Islam.

- The Quran and Islam was created by Abdul Malik in the 8th century who was a caliph from 685-705 - the great Arab reformer.

- Abdul Malik takes and creates an Identity for Arabs.

- Abdul Malik names who the prophet will be.

- Abdul Malik creates the first Quran in the 8th century.

- Abdul Malik Introduces the name Muslim.

- Abdul Malik Introduces the name Islam.

- It all begins with Abdul Malik in the 8th century.

- 200 to 300 years after Muhammad's death, the Quran was made.

- We have the biography of Muhammad at the 9th century.

- There is no complete manuscript at all from the 7th century, they only appear in the 8th century.

- 70% of the Quran is borrowed writings from Jewish writings and Christian sectarians and is all agreed with western scholars.

- There are no peaceful verses in the Quran.

- Muhammad was never about peace. He killed, raped, and robbed everywhere he went.

- 20% of Muslim scholars don't even understand the Quran.

- The Quran has no complete stories, only in Sura 12, about Joseph, stories don’t begin, stories don't end. No transitional phrase from story to story. It's confusing. The Bible makes total sense.

- Muhammad is the model in Islam.

- Allah wants everybody to be like Muhammad.

- Jesus Christ is the model in Christianity.

- God wants Christians to follow Jesus Christ, His Only begotten Son for eternal life.

- The Quran is not a book to understand, it is a book to get salvation and blessings.

- 75% of Christians that converted from Islam all had dreams at night saying that Jesus Christ appeared to them dressed in white and declares his name to be Jesus Christ, The Son of God, not Isa.

- Muslims call their Muslim Jesus Isa. Muslims got the wrong Jesus.

The Bible passes every test unlike the Quran.

- "Whoever has the Son (Jesus) has life; whoever does not have the Son of God does not have life" - 1 John 5:12

- "Whoever believes in the Son (Jesus) has eternal life, but whoever rejects the Son will not see life, for God's wrath (Hell) remains on them" - John 3:36.

Accept the Biblical Jesus Christ - The Son of God into your hearts for redemption of your sins and be saved to have eternal life.

Category Headings